You are here
China’s Currency & U.S.-China Relations
China’s Currency & U.S.-China Relations
Monday, 5 April 2010
This event featured panelists Robert Z. Aliber, emeritus professor of international economics and finance at the Graduate School of Business at the University of Chicago; Daniel Rosen, adjunct associate professor at Columbia University and visiting fellow with the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE); and Shang-Jin Wei, professor of finance and economics and N.T. Wang Chair in Chinese Business and Economy at Columbia Business School. Professor Janow moderated this panel discussion, which centered on China’s currency as pegged to the USD and implications for the future of U.S.-China relations.
Professor Janow opened by briefly noting the escalation of tensions between the United States and China on a number of issues including trade, arms sales to Taiwan, and the yuan. The Chinese yuan has been pegged to the USD since mid-2008 and there exist a variety of views within the United States and China on how much and how soon the yuan should appreciate.
Professor Aliber reviewed China’s phenomenal average annual growth rate for the last thirty years of 14 percent in the traded goods sector and eight percent in the non-traded goods sector. He argued that China’s large trade surplus, 5% of GDP, combined with massive amounts of international reserve assets, $2,600 billion, have resulted primarily from China’s policies of financial repression which were adopted to maintain its undervalued currency. He believes that as long as China continues to grow rapidly and productivity in the traded goods sector remains strong, the Chinese yuan’s real appreciation is inevitable. In the end, the government faces a complex series of trade-offs that involve the nominal appreciation of the yuan, an increase in the consumer price level, and consequences resulting from further financial repression. He argued that financial repression cannot be a long-term equilibrium situation, considering Japan’s failed usage of repression policies in the past. If China is not willing to reduce its bilateral trade surplus with the United States, he believes the U.S. government should adopt its own measures to lower the imbalance.
Professor Rosen then outlined the three main allegations against an unappreciated yuan: (1) its contribution to external imbalances in the United States; (2) its role in allowing China to accumulate an unnatural level of power; and (3) its ability to cause global imbalances which prevent the existence of a stable global economy. He then discussed the comparison between China and Japan in the 1980s, the true cause of the U.S.-China trade imbalance, and his recommendations for future policy. He believes that even if the yuan is allowed to appreciate, it will not solve the fundamental trade imbalance between the United States and China. He concluded that the United States needs to consume less, save more, and generate higher GDP growth to shift its net imports lower.
Professor Wei believes that the yuan’s appreciation and its effects on the U.S. current account deficit and American job market are greatly exaggerated. Instead he believes there are structural factors behind the imbalances. For example, since the United States has bilateral trade imbalances with 140 economies, a reduction in the yuan may not reduce the imbalance as much as people claim. Furthermore, if the yuan appreciates and China’s exports decrease, the jobs will more likely be transferred to Cambodia rather than California, so it wouldn’t affect the American job market very much. Finally, if the yuan appreciates, there will be winners and losers in both the United States and China. In the United States, the winners will be the export firms, while the losers will be the majority of the poor who will no longer be able to buy imports from China at lower prices. In China, the winners will be importers and the majority of the poor while the losers will be exporters. Therefore, the appreciation of the yuan implies a subsidy from the working poor in the United States to those in China.
The panel discussion ended with a lively question and answer session. Ultimately, while there were varied opinions on how the U.S.-China bilateral trade imbalance can be resolved, Professors Aliber, Rosen, and Wei were all in agreement that the yuan should be allowed to appreciate and that policies must be made on both sides of the Pacific to resolve the growing trade imbalance.
This event was co-sponsored by IFEP as part of its Distinguished Speaker Series.
APEC Study Center at Columbia University
Columbia University, 3022 Broadway
2M-9 Uris Hall
New York, NY 10027-7004
The Curl Ideas to wrap your mind around
Is Australia on the Wrong Track?
Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott has defended many of his government’s reforms by invoking the American model of cutbacks on spending.Read More
For Some CEOs, No Price Is Too High to Retain Control In a Proxy Battle
In new research from Columbia Business School, CEOs are three times as likely to value shares above market value to avoid getting pushed outRead More
Smarter Ads for Smartphones: When They Do and Don't Work
Study demystifies effectiveness of smartphone ads; offers marketers tipsRead More
Wounded Warrior Project: Leading from the Front
As the WWP entered its second decade, what governance policies and practices would ensure its continued success?Read More
Wei Jiang Named Director of Chazen Institute
Wei Jiang, the Arthur F. Burns Professor of Free and Competitive Enterprise in the Finance and Economics Division, has been appointed Director of the School’s Jerome A. Chazen Institute of International Business.Read More
Sharp Electronics in 2013
In 2013 Sharp Electronics shareholders expressed their outrage in the face of the company’s unmet technological challenges, plunging share price, and governance missteps. To turn Sharp around, President Kozo Takahashi would be forced to undo decisions that his predecessors had made and break with past traditions concerning Sharp’s corporate governance. Would Takahashi be successful in steering Sharp away from insolvency and towards a more competitive position in the worldwide consumer electronics industry?Read More
Are You Seen as a Jerk at Work? A New Study Reveals That Many People Are Oblivious to How They Come across to Counterparts and Colleagues
Columbia Business School research highlights the disconnect between peoples’ own views and their counterparts’ views of their assertiveness—and the impact it can have on negotiationsRead More
Fair Value Accounting’s Role in Financial Crisis Scrutinized
Prof. Urooj Khan’s research finds that fair value accounting was unfairly blamed for the 2008–2009 financial crisis, but recognizes that some investors reacted positively to news that rules would be relaxed in response to the crisis.Read More
New Insights on the Factors That Intensified the 2008 Financial Crisis
Columbia Business School study says analysts’ concerns about fair value accounting clouded the already murky waters, fueling the crisisRead More