- IBS Curriculum
- Innovation and the Value of Privacy
- Growth for Entrepreneurs
- Can My Company Change?
- Business and Politics
- Small Worlds of Governance
- Bolder Policies for Diversity?
- Governance and Compensation
- The Quantitative Revolution
- Inclusive Leadership
- Preventing the Next Crisis
- Universities and Women
- The Benjamin Botwinick Prizes in Business Ethics
- The Paul M. Montrone Seminar Series on Ethics
- The KPMG Peat Marwick / Stanley R. Klion Forum
- Annual Leadership Conference
- Bernstein Debates
- Diversity and Inclusion for All
- Events Calendar
- Support Us
The popular press and a recent spate of remarkable books have pointed critically to the contribution of financial innovation and quantitative models to the financial crisis. The broader critiques doubt the risk management capabilities of firms and regulators to understand and evaluate complex financial instruments, such as synthetic securities.
These critiques cut at the core of the Basel II international regulations which permitted banks to create their own models to value illiquid and risky assets. They also have major implications for the design of a regulatory system and regulations regarding whether regulation is at all possible, who is best able to do it, and ultimately if complex financial innovation should be sharply curtailed.
Research Symposium --
The Quantitative Revolution and the Crisis: How Have Quantitative Financial Models Been Used and Misused?
Co-hosted by: The Center on Japanese Economy and Business and the Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. Center for Leadership and Ethics
Friday December 4, 2009
8:30 a.m. – 2:00 p.m.
Venue: The Italian Academy
|8:30 – 8:45 AM
Breakfast and Registration
|8:45 – 9:00 AM||
Welcome and Introduction
Introduction of Keynote speaker by Bruce Kogut
|9:00 – 9:45 AM||
Donald MacKenzie is one of the leading scholars on the impact of option modeling on market behavior as well as a frequent contributor to the current debate.
|9:45 – 11:15 AM||
Panel 1: Does the Practice of Quantitative Finance Need to Be Changed?
See video of this panel on YouTube.
Paul Glasserman (Moderator)
(15 minute presentations, 30 minutes Q&A )
|11:30 – 1:00 PM||
Panel 2: Why Was the Financial Crisis Less Enduring in Japan and Other Countries…this time around?
See video of this panel on YouTube.
Ronald Gilson (Moderator)
|1:00 – 2:00 PM||Closing Remarks and Buffet Lunch|
Researchers and faculty interested in attending future symposia can contact: leadershipethics (AT) gsb (DOT) columbia (DOT) edu.
Related Academic papers
Beunza, Daniel and Stark, David, 2009, "Looking Out, Locking In: Financial Models and the Social Dynamics of Arbitrage Disasters", available at SSRN.
MacKenzie, Donald "All Those Arrows", June 2009.
MacKenzie, Donald "Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets", June 2006.
MacKenzie, Donald "Models as Coordination Devices".
Derman, Emanuel "On Fischer Black: Intuition is a Merging of the Understander with the Understood". Talk delivered at Bloomberg, NYC. November 24, 2009.
Derman, Emanuel "Models".
Academics and industry experts discuss how financial innovation and quantitative models contributed to the financial crisis. Featured here are Paul Glasserman of Columbia Business School, Emanuel Derman of Columbia University, Daniel Beunza of the London School of Economics, Kent Daniel of Goldman Sachs and Adam Parker of Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.
Why have the financial sectors in some countries been less damaged by the financial crisis than others? What role did financial innovations and regulations play? Offering their views are Ronald Gilson of Columbia Law School, Takatoshi Ito of the University of Tokyo, Floyd Norris of the New York Times, Jacques Longerstaey of State Street Global Advisors and Thierry Porte of J.C. Flowers.