Apple vs. Samsung: The $2 Billion Case

How did conjoint analysis support Apple’s $2 billion lawsuit against Samsung?
Oded Netzer, Rajan Sambandam  | Spring 2014
Print this page
Apple Inc. sued Samsung Electronics for approximately $2 billion, contending that Samsung violated some of its patents by copying Apple’s product features. Apple’s expert witness team used a conjoint analysis in order to assign a value to the product features in question—thereby attempting to assess the magnitude of Apples’ revenue loss as a result of the patent infringement. This case asks students to evaluate the design of this study as well as the pros and cons of its use in this context.

Case ID: 150505

Buy select cases through Ivey Publishing and Harvard Business Publishing.

 

Contact us by e-mail at Columbia CaseWorks or 646-745-8495.