- IBS Curriculum
- The Botwinick Prize in Business Ethics
- The Paul M. Montrone Seminar Series on Ethics
- The KPMG Peat Marwick / Stanley R. Klion Forum
- Annual Leadership Conference
- Restoring Trust
- Conscious Capitalism: How Ethical Executives Move the Needle Forward, One Business Decision at a Time
- Lucy Quist: A Global Role Model for Business Leadership
- Two Industry Pioneers Lead the Change for Clean Energy
- The Great Debate on the Ethics of Pricing in the Drug Industry
- Leading With Courage: Top Industry Trailblazers Discuss Pathways to Restoring Trust in Business
- Innovation and the Value of Privacy
- Restoring Trust
- Bernstein Debates
- Diversity and Inclusion for All
- Leadership and Ethics Week
- Events Calendar
- Support Us
About the Debate
Can financial markets be reconstructed to achieve a better alignment of profit and purpose? Can businesses commit to being social mission-driven enterprises?
Milton Friedman argued that the primary duty of firms is to make a profit, benefiting investors and employees. And that charity is the appropriate vehicle by which to fund social missions. Our debate will focus on a paradoxical theory proposed in new work by Luigi Zingales along with Oliver Hart. Zingales will discuss why firms are responsible to pursue social missions when they create societal damages that are not separable from their primary business. And yet, even if their sustainable investors endorse the policy, the public firm will be unable to commit credibly to it, and financial markets will fail to succeed to redress the social harm. He will argue for a strengthening of shareholder democracy as a solution, among others.
In response, David Crane will comment on this new theory based upon his much applauded actions in leading one of the largest energy utilities towards sustainable and profitable investments.