NEW YORK – Swipe left or swipe right? The new norm in dating comes down to a split-second decision based solely on a face and maybe one question: does this person look trustworthy enough to date? Thanks to social media and dating apps, people are asked to judge others solely on their appearance more than ever before. More and more people are judging a book by its cover, believing their instincts are correct. According to new research from Columbia Business School, they might be right more often than not—but for a surprising reason.
The study, conducted by psychologists Michael Slepian and Daniel Ames from Columbia Business School, explores the link between apparent facial trustworthiness and deceptive behavior, revealing two major findings. The authors found that trust judgments based on faces alone are more accurate than chance. Experts have debated whether quick judgments based on solely on faces yield meaningful predictions of things like honesty.
"Past research is split about whether such a link exists, but we found that people who looked trustworthy were in fact more likely to act trustworthy," said Michael Slepian, co-author of the study and a professor at Columbia Business School. “Of course, not every judgment of every face is right, and people are susceptible to baseless stereotypes in judging others on appearances. But finding evidence of the link between faces and honesty led us to dig deeper into why this link might emerge."
This new research suggests that such judgments might have some reliability. In the study, one group of people judged a set of participants based only on their photographs, predicting how trustworthy they would be. Those participants then interacted, face-to-face, with other individuals, where the participants had monetary incentives to lie. Trustworthiness judgments from the photographs predicted how often the participants lied in the face-to-face interactions.
Before the live interactions in the study, where participants had incentives to lie to counterparts, the participants predicted how often they would be trusted by their counterparts. The researchers speculated that people might have "internalized impressions," sensing how others might expect them to act, and internalizing these expectations and acting consistently with them. The researchers' hunch was confirmed with the second major finding of the study. The participants’ expectations of how they would be treated accounted for part of the link between their apparent facial trustworthiness and their behavior. The reason why facial appearance might predict honesty is that people often anticipate how others will judge them and they act accordingly.
"People with trustworthy faces acted more honestly, in part because they expected to be trusted, and wanted to live up to those expectations. Those who looked untrustworthy were somewhat more likely to lie seemingly because they sensed that they wouldn't be trusted," said Daniel Ames, co-author and a professor at Columbia Business School. "A lifetime of being more likely to be trusted or mistrusted on the basis of your own face could lead you to live up or down to how you expect to be treated, even if you don't realize the role your own face is playing."
The research holds implications for people judging others and for being judged. When it comes to judging someone else, that person's face might hold a signal, but it's a noisy one. The researchers stress that the major finding of the study is that people tend to live up or down to a counterpart's expectations.
"When you're in the role of evaluating someone else, you may want to send a clear signal yourself: that you hope and expect that person will act in a trustworthy way," said Slepian.
The authors offer a little more food for thought just in time for Valentine’s Day that might have some rethinking their online profiles. When it comes to being judged, when all someone else has to go on is a photo, it's inevitable that they'll judge a book by its cover. To be read more completely by someone else, Ames says the implication is clear: "Give them more to go on."
To learn more about cutting-edge research being performed by Columbia Business School faculty members, please visit www.gsb.columbia.edu.
About Columbia Business School
Columbia Business School is the only world–class, Ivy League business school that delivers a learning experience where academic excellence meets with real–time exposure to the pulse of global business. Led by Dean Glenn Hubbard, the School’s transformative curriculum bridges academic theory with unparalleled exposure to real–world business practice, equipping students with an entrepreneurial mindset that allows them to recognize, capture, and create opportunity in any business environment. The thought leadership of the School’s faculty and staff, combined with the accomplishments of its distinguished alumni and position in the center of global business, means that the School’s efforts have an immediate, measurable impact on the forces shaping business every day. To learn more about Columbia Business School’s position at the very center of business, please visit www.gsb.columbia.edu.
About the researchers
R. Glenn Hubbard
Professor Hubbard is a specialist in public finance, managerial information and incentive problems in corporate finance, and financial markets and institutions. He has written...Read more.
Michael Slepian is Assistant Professor in the Management Division of Columbia Business School. His program of research examines secrecy and trust. He studies the...Read more.
Professor Ames's research focuses on social judgment and behavior. He examines how people judge themselves as well as the individuals and groups around...Read more.