Abstract

This paper studies an incomplete contracting model to compare the effectiveness of alternative transfer pricing mechanisms. Transfer pricing serves the dual purpose of guiding intracompany transfers and providing incentives for upfront investments at the divisional level. When transfer prices are determined through negotiation, divisional managers will have insufficient investment incentives due to "hold-up" problems. While cost-based transfer pricing can avoid such "hold-ups", it does suffer from distortions in intracompany transfers. Our analysis shows that negotiation frequently performs better than a cost-based pricing system, though we identify circumstances under which cost-based transfer pricing emerges as the superior alternative.

Download PDF

Citation

Baldenius, Tim, Stefan Reichelstein, and Savita Sahay. "Negotiated Versus Cost-Based Transfer Pricing." Review of Accounting Studies 4, no. 2 (1999): 67-91.

Each author name for a Columbia Business School faculty member is linked to a faculty research page, which lists additional publications by that faculty member.

Each topic is linked to an index of publications on that topic.