Abstract

Prior research shows that perceivers can judge some traits better than others in first impressions of targets. However, questions remain about which traits perceivers naturally do infer. Here, we develop an account of the "agreeableness asymmetry": although perceivers show little ability to accurately gauge target agreeableness in first impressions, we find that agreeableness is generally the most commonly-inferred disposition among the Big Five dimensions of personality (agreeableness, extraversion, conscientiousness, openness, and emotional stability). Using open-ended impressions based on photographs, videos, and face-to-face encounters, three studies show agreeableness as the most prevalently-judged of the Big Five although it is also poorly-judged in both absolute and relative terms. We use interpersonal power to reveal an underlying mechanism. Manipulating the power of perceivers relative to targets substantially shifts impression content, suggesting that habitual interaction and relational concerns may partially explain perceivers' chronic interest in assessing agreeableness despite their limited ability to do so.

Citation

Ames, Daniel, and Emily Bianchi. "The agreeableness asymmetry in first impressions: Perceivers' impulse to (mis)judge agreeableness and how it is moderated by power." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34 (2008): 1719-1735.

Each author name for a Columbia Business School faculty member is linked to a faculty research page, which lists additional publications by that faculty member.

Each topic is linked to an index of publications on that topic.