Abstract

This research investigates the effects of regulatory focus on alternative search and consideration set formation in consumer decision making. Results from three experiments yield two primary findings. First, promotion‐focused consumers tend to search for alternatives at a more global level, whereas prevention‐focused consumers tend to search for alternatives at a more local level. Second, promotion‐focused consumers tend to have larger consideration sets than do prevention‐focused consumers. Building on these two primary findings, it is additionally shown that whereas promotion‐focused consumers attach relatively greater value to options chosen from hierarchically structured sets, prevention‐focused consumers attach relatively greater value to options chosen from nonhierarchically structured item lists. Finally, whereas promotion‐focused consumers attach significantly greater value to options chosen from larger sets than to options chosen from smaller sets, prevention‐focused consumers do not attach significantly less value to options chosen from larger sets than to options chosen from smaller sets.

Download PDF

Citation

Pham, Michel Tuan, and Hannah Chang. "Regulatory Focus, Regulatory Fit, and the Search and Consideration of Choice Alternatives." Journal of Consumer Research 37, no. 4 (December 2010): 626-640.

Each author name for a Columbia Business School faculty member is linked to a faculty research page, which lists additional publications by that faculty member.

Each topic is linked to an index of publications on that topic.